Talk:Ages of Three Children puzzle

Untitled

The discussion on this is incorrect.

Merely having two children aged 6 does not eliminate having an eldest. even in identical twins, one is born first, even if by only a minute, and therefore is the eldest child. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.183.31.2 (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that bugs me too. The puzzle requires that we trust the census taker to employ flawless arithmetic skills and an expansive memory, but we allow him to not know the meaning of the word "eldest". In the real world, this isn't a realistic combination of assumptions. I suppose you could argue that in this kind of puzzle, we're supposed to make such assumptions, but that seems disrespectful of people who didn't grow up with recreational math and don't know the unspoken rules.

It would be nice if a realiable source could be found saying something to this effect. I haven't checked. Melchoir (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

It's not that he doesn't know the meaning of the word -- the underlying assumption is that a parent of twins wouldn't refer to "my eldest child" even though it could technically be justified. Not being a twin or a parent of twins myself, I don't know how well that assumption holds up in the real world. 91.107.151.102 (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

It is possible to have one child aged 6 years and 1 month, and another aged 6 years and 11 months. With premature babies, it is conceivable to have as many as three separate birth events within 12 months. Allowing multiple births, adoption, surrogate mothers, etc., it is possible to have an arbitrarily large number of children who all identify as "6 years old". Melchoir (talk) 20:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

I was thinking of Melchoir's point, it's certainly not necessary to have twins to have two children the same "rounded-down age". Similarly, I don't like the phrasing in the text that "the same basic issue [includes] that the ages are distinct" - even if we ignore the problem that the eldest may be the same age in years as the second-eldest, the fact there is an eldest does not show that all the ages are distinct - just that they're not all the same (the bottom two could still have the same age). TheGrappler (talk) 21:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible to rephrase the "I have to see to my eldest child who is in bed with measles." to something else so that it is clear that there is a solid solution to this puzzle? Something that states that the youngest have the same age or that the youngest are twins? (sirKitKat) 78.21.21.68 (talk) 10:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I have known at least 6 sets of twins, and for every one of them, their parents absolutely DO refer to one as older and one as younger. And I would bet when the twins are first born or last born, it would be even more likely that parents would refer to one as their oldest child or one as their youngest child. This is just a poorly framed riddle.69.112.239.6 (talk) 13:36, 16 March 2022 (UTC)