(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);[2] and
Speaking from experience, I'd recommend that you archive the ratings sources - we recently lost a whole bunch of sources as they weren't archived. Zap2it is usually pretty good for being archived, but I've still found a couple of missing ones so it's best to ensure that archive.org has them while you can.
"featuring Peggy Carter" - might be worthwhile that you're referring to a character here as this is the first time in the actual prose of the article that you mention her.
Is it worthwhile mentioning that Cooper plays the younger version of Howard Stark in the franchise, while John Slattery plays an older version. I wouldn't have mentioned it based off of Slattery's sole appearence in Iron Man 2, but I just saw Ant-Man and was surprised to see him back again.
I'm not sure, just because Cooper already played the character in Captain America and one of the one-shots. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Props
Out of curiosity, was there any information available to say whether props were re-used from other productions?
Not that we have found so far, but it is something I am keeping an eye out for just in case. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Broadcast
The UK information will need to be updated as it is being broadcast on Fox TV.
There is some currently hidden on the page, for which we are just waiting on a reliable source rather than Amazon's listing. - adamstom97 (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's pretty much everything - I'll stick it on hold for the typical seven days now. Miyagawa (talk) 23:22, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Great - I'm happy to promote. Miyagawa (talk) 09:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
^ Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
^This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics.
^Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
^Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
^The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.