Talk:Agathis macrophylla

A. vitiensis is a synonym ?[edit]

Erased statement

A. vitiensis is a synonym according to some, a seperate species according to others.

Maybe the latter part of above statement is not true any more according to the latest botanical studies, but I am not a botanist. I do know however that there are not so old works which threat the two (vitiensis and macrophylla) as very distinct.

So some words about this should return to the article. --Tauʻolunga 06:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So isn't that already covered because it is already mentioned in the taxobox, along with another synonym, and there are plenty of species where multiple names occur in various sources. The IUCN calls vitiensis a synonym of macrophylla, as does GRIN. But if some sources are still using the old names, fair enough Kahuroa 07:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure you get my point. To me a synonym means: 1 species, 2 names. But 'v' and 'm' are seen as 2 distinct species by some. --Tauʻolunga 05:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

'Synonym' seems to cover both the situations you mention. Can you tell us more about who said it and when? Kahuroa 06:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For example: Multipurpose trees for agroforestry in the Pacific islands; R.R. Thaman, C.R. Elevitch, K.M. Wilkinson (http://www.agroforestry.net/pubs/Multspec.pdf) --Tauʻolunga 07:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's dated 2000 - and I note that Elevitch is one of the authors. The same man in 2006 is an editor of The Lex Thompson source listed in the references of this article, so that suggests he has changed his mind between 2000 and 2006, and now includes v in m. Kahuroa 07:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Tauʻolunga 07:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agathis macrophylla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070714012054/http://www.conifers.org/ar/ag/vitiensis.html to http://www.conifers.org/ar/ag/vitiensis.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]