Talk:Adrift in a Great City

Adrift in a Great City has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 17, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Film: Silent / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Silent films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Adrift in a Great City/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Going to take a look at this article once I finish reviewing a NASCAR article. good888 (talk) 18:12, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Just going to be working on a few other things in the mean time. Got a few other Thanhouser's after that if you are interested. The good news is that most of these have images to go with them. The Actor's Children has two unique images which Google took within minutes of uploading, but meh. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review is now complete. good888 (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

"The film begins with Pat Moran who pays for passage of his wife and daughter" The passage you mean.
"Left by themselves, the daughter works in a sweatshop" Link sweatshop.

Production

"but a review in The New York Dramatic Mirror made the assumption that the scenes were shot in the morning." Link The New York Dramatic Mirror.

Release and reception

Link Missouri, The Morning Telegraph and Moving Picture World.
"The film is presumed lost." Any reason why?

References

Link the publishers of these sources if possible.

Categories

Add this film to the lost films category.

Going to place on hold for now. I will promote once the issues are addressed. good888 (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Good888: Fixes done. There is no main reason for the Thanhouser film's to be lost, in fact they seem to have a much better than average survival rate. Of 1087 films more than 20% survive. I cannot link to the Silent Era website for the presumption of loss - but it is not a known surviving work. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that this is my 50th GA review. Anyway, since all the issues have been addressed, I will promote to GA class. good888 (talk) 16:19, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]