Talk:Admiral Beatty Hotel

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: New Brunswick Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.

Travel and Tourism: Hotels

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels.

A fact from Admiral Beatty Hotel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that following its closure, the former Admiral Beatty Hotel was converted into a senior citizens' apartment building?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Admiral Beatty Hotel.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that following its closure, the former Admiral Beatty Hotel was converted into a senior citizens' apartment building? Source: https://atlanticbusinessmagazine.ca/web-exclusives/living-the-suite-life-at-97-year-old-admiral-beatty-hotel/,
https://www.sjnph.net/rotary-admiral-beatty-complex (official website),
https://da.tj.news/viewer?opub=Telegraph_Journal&date=19890605&page=21&filename=4870_TJ_1989_A (subscription only newspaper archive, talks about the hotel shutting down in 1982, proposals in 1984 to renovate the building for apartments suited for low-income families and the elderly, as well as its first tenants arriving in late 1985.)
- Reviewed:

Created by B3251 (talk). Self-nominated at 17:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Admiral Beatty Hotel; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: QPQ waived. AGF on source supporting hook. My only issue might be with the use of the word "reestablished" in the hook and article. Does the source use this word? It seems like "converted into" might be more appropriate. Ergo Sum 16:47, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go now. Ergo Sum 18:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good work!

Tails Wx 00:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]