Talk:Absolute location
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Source[edit]
I think we can do better than having Barron's AP coursebook as a source, or can't we? 121.130.76.122 (talk) 14:15, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Cleanup[edit]
This article needs a complete cleanup, sources, and an article split, dividing it into Absolute location and Relative location. The style of writing in the Relative location doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards as well. --75.162.237.173 (talk) 01:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
Merge suggestion[edit]
This article should included into the Location (geography) page. The notion of absolute location is false (see my comments above, plus "Teaching geography", Philip Gersmehl, page 60 - it's on Google Books), and besides there is no longer an article for relative location (which is a real concept). Randomgurn (talk) 11:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC) yea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.131.194.225 (talk) 00:07, 23 August 2011 (UTC)