Talk:A404(M) motorway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

It is wrongly numbered as it is south of the A4 and it is an A road with motorway regulations.

Why does being south of the A4 prevent it being the A404(M)? Please either explain in the article or link to somewhere that does. Loganberry (Talk) 14:16, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's very debatable if it's wrongly numbered or not. The Great Britain road numbering scheme says that to be a zone-4 A-road (i.e. in the "cone" defined by the area between A4 and A5 roads), no part of it should enroach on an anticlockwise cone (the 3-zone, defined by the cone between the A3 and A4 roads). Here's a better explanation.
The A404 does not encroach into the 3-zone, whereas the A404(M) does. Whether that constitutes breaking the numbering rules is unclear - sufficiently so that the claim should probably be removed. (M404 would be a correctly numbered motorway, as it's in the motorway 4-zone which differes from the A-road 4-zone). --Erath 14:33, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A404(M) motorway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]