Talk:7th Louisiana Infantry Regiment (Confederate)

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

United States: Louisiana / Civil War / Military history Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Louisiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Louisiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	American Civil War portal This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Civil War task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

B class review[edit]

These comments were made by reviewers at the Military History Assessment page. My response follows. Djmaschek (talk) 01:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

B class. I suggest working in the mentions of the changes in senior positions presently in the formation section into the relevant service section. Narratively, I don't think the way it presently reads works that well. --Cheers, Zawed.
@Zawed: Field promotions added to 1862 section in chronological order. I left the two administrative promotions in the Formation section.
The Battle of Chantilly is only mentioned in the infobox. --Catlemur
@Catlemur: Chantilly added to 1862 section.