Talk:731 (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 16:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

"The episode's production was successful for several involved, earning director of photography John Bartley an award nomination for his work, and securing Bowman the job of directing the series' subsequent film adaptation The X-Files." Can you be a bit more specific. What award and who are the "several involved" and in what ways were they successful. Doesn't need much but its a little vague..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've specified a bit more with it. Does it look alright? GRAPPLE X 16:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes fine.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • "Director Rob Bowman called the episode one of his all time favorites." Citation needed..♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Added. Was the same as the next ref but I've added another use of it for clarity. GRAPPLE X 16:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Excellent, I rather like that old Japanese photo and the production text.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]