Talk:5th (Mhow) Division

Military history: Asian / British / European / South Asia / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	World War I task force

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 5th (Mhow) Division. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090909172657/http://orbat.com:80/site/history/historical/india/army1914.html to http://orbat.com/site/history/historical/india/army1914.html

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.warpath.orbat.com/indian_divs/5_ind_div.htm

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:27, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article mentions Jubbulore Brigade, and I reached it via a redirect from the same. Is this a typo for Jubbulpore? - which seems quite likely to this ignoramus.

MacAuslan (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]