Talk:5O

Requested move 8 October 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Splitting into new Five-O page as per consensus — Amakuru (talk) 16:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

5O → Five-O – Most of the uses described on this disambiguation page are styled this way, and the current title is visually confusing with 50. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's clearly enough to have a dab at Five-O, I'm not sure whether the page should be split or moved though. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. There are already DAB pages at 1O, 2O, 3O, 4O, 6O, 7O, 8O and 9O so these should be dealt with together if there is an issue of confusion with 10, &c. If, as User:power~enwiki feels, there is enough Five-O material for a separate DAB page, split it, but don't move this one. — AjaxSmack 02:35, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also the confusingly-styled 0O and O0. Separately, there's a move discussion at Talk:Hawaii Five-O ongoing. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The split to create a separate dab page at Five-O may be a good idea. —BarrelProof (talk) 04:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the proposed move per AjaxSmack; however, I would support the proposed split of 5O and Five-O into separate pages. bd2412 T 14:33, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.