Talk:2019 Cyprus rape allegation case

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expansion[edit]

Hi there, I didn't realize that we already had an article on this topic. So, I have pasted my version into this article. Have integrated the four footnotes into the new version. Should we consider renaming it the 2019 Ayia Napa rape allegation case due to the contested nature of the case? Andykatib 04:44, January 12, 2019 (UTC)

Not sure what the correct name is but looking at [1] "Cyprus rape case" seems to be the most common. The 2019 part probably isn't necessary either. I haven't been active in 10 years, so rules may have changed, but back then you called an article what other people were calling the same subject. And extra stuff like 2019 or other disambiguation stuff was only added to distinguish it from other existing wiki articles, not things like other rape cases in Cyprus that don't have a wiki articles. Peregrine Fisher (talk) 16:50, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How about the 2019 Cyprus rape allegation case as a compromise? I chose to include the year because there would have been various rape and rape allegation cases in Cyprus before that and probably in the future. I chose the name Ayia Napa since that was the area that it occurred in. Will also work on finding sources to replace those from The Sun, which is currently on Wikipedia's list of unreliable sources. Andykatib 01:28, 13 January, 2019 (UTC)

That sounds good to me. I think people looking for this article will be able to find it with that title. Peregrine Fisher (talk) 01:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

English variant[edit]

@Peregrine Fisher:, @Andykatib: I have added a British English tag to the article as it is about the trial of a British woman in a Commonwealth country. It therefore has strong ties to British English. TSventon (talk) 12:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks, forgot to add that. Andykatib 18:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ayia Napa Rape Allegation[edit]

The information provided in the entry seems to stem from newspaper accounts repeating the defence attorney's talking points. It would help if someone Nānākuli Hears (talk) 06:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nānākuli Hears: The article talk page is the best place to discuss improvements to the article, but please note the warning at the top of the page and read the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy first.
"This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard." TSventon (talk) 20:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]