Talk:2015–16 Inter Milan season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 14 July 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 19:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


2015–16 F.C. Internazionale Milano season2015–16 Inter Milan season – Based on the discussion at Talk:Inter Milan#Requested move 5 July 2015. Season articles should reflect the club article names. This should apply to all past seasons, templates, categories and related articles as well, but I don't know how to identify them all or how to make the move apply to them all. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 00:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, based on that discussion we should not be piping the WP:COMMONNAME out with a foreign name: [[Inter Milan|Internazionale]] should not be used. Other article to follow. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 17:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been Inter Milan for three years, since Spring 2012. Why is it now a problem to pipe to Internazionale if the link is still to Inter Milan? Leave it alone. Piping takes place in every season article across all the leagues, for example in the Eredivisie PSV Eindhoven often gets piped to PSV in season articles. This is getting ridiculous, and I have a feeling you'll get many editors constantly editing back to Internazionale. Italia2006 (talk) 18:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was concerned strictly with moving the Inter Milan article. It has not been moved, resume the status quo. Italia2006 (talk) 18:36, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion was not concerned strictly with moving. There is commentary about its repercussions. It's a problem now because it's always been a problem. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 20:23, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose are we going now to request moving all articles ? what is the point ? . it is just fine as this . I would like people to be more interested in help editing this article than just changing the name and never then help editing Adnan (talk) 10:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.. exactly. Italia2006 (talk) 14:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we are going to request moving all articles that are incorrectly named. It's named incorrectly. I would like people to be more interested in helping making Wikipedia a consistent resource. Adding unsourced information to an article that is incorrectly named never helped anything. 208.81.212.222 (talk) 17:31, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015–16 Inter Milan season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]