Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF third round

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disciplinary proceedings against Equatorial Guinea[edit]

Could this mean that Cape Verde can still qualify instead of Tunisia? Schnapper (talk) 10:26, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - I added the note to Tunisia in the Qualification table as well Australian Matt (talk) 10:33, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Livescores[edit]

Hi

Per WP:LIVESCORES we should not add scores to matches still in play. Please wait until match is finished and then add the score. If you dont discuss here your edits will be considered disrutive and you might get warned and blocked. This has also been discussed on WT:FOOTY many times. QED237 (talk) 18:20, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance[edit]

Hi.

Please stop changing attendance at 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Third Round without using any sources. For example the Match report clearly states 30,900 and editing against that source without an own source will be considered disruptive and unsourced and the editor might get warned and blocked. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 21:58, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2014 FIFA World Cup qualification – CAF Third Round. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]