Talk:2012 Indiana gubernatorial election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rupert Boneham's photo[edit]

I can't help but wonder if the candidate's photo shows bias - or at least inconsistency.--184.175.153.214 (talk) 04:05, 19 September 2012 (UTC) We deleted the photo for bias concerns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maawallace (talkcontribs) 04:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC) Could someone put in county results. Thanks[reply]

Bias[edit]

Please stop removing the Libertarian candidate, Rupert Boneham, from this page. Please stop removing his photo (it is licensed and from his website). Rupert Boneham will be on the ballot in indiana on November 6th. Your bias for Mr. Boneham and third parties does not belong on Wikipedia.IndyEvan (talk) 18:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's NPOV policy requires unbiased treatment of candidates. It is inappropriate to use Wikipedia to support one candidate for public office at the expense of other candidates. These arbitrary and capricious "criteria" such as 5% in a poll have no place in Wikipedia. M Carling 10:58, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indiana gubernatorial election, 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]