Talk:2011 Tirreno–Adriatico/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 00:54, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:57, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose good, organization good. I made a few minor copy-edits. Complies sufficiently with key MoS elements. I note US English spelling, you might wish to put Template:American English on the talk page.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References appear RS, support the cited statements, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficient detail without unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Captioned and licensed OK

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I have no hesitation in passing this as a good artcile. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)