Talk:2011–12 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team

2011–12 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 24, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 19, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that 2011–12 Ivy League teams Harvard and Princeton both defeated 2012 ACC Men's Basketball Tournament Champion Florida State?

College Basketball Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2011–12 Princeton Tigers men's basketball team/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I remembered right, I reviewed Harvard when Princeton went to the big dance last year, so naturally with Harvard making it in this year, I'll review Princeton. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are my issues:

"With a new head coach for the team and a head coach who is a first-time head coach, the team got off to slow starts." Can be cleaned up. Maybe simply "With a new first-time head coach, the team got.."
- Done.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"game against the 2011–12 Quakers.[12] Princeton's victory " what was the score? It's in the table but no reason not to have it in the prose in this case.
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:35, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Princeton's victory enabled it to retain slim 26–25 and 24–23 leads in terms of Ivy League Championships and Ivy League team NCAA Tournament appearances, respectively." I'm a bit confused here. I presume it's meant that Princeton has one more championship than Penn, but if that's the case then this game wouldn't factor in. Perhaps changing it to "enabled them to hold on to slim.." would be better just so it doesn't sound like the game decided the championship.
- Look at the conference standings. If Penn had won one more game, they would have earned a share of the championship.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing too major, just mainly the one piece that I can't seem to wrap my head around. I'll put this on hold. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I see now; I was looking at the overall record instead of conference, makes sense. Article passes as GA. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 16:05, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]