Talk:2009 NCAA Division I FBS football season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Key Games[edit]

It seems like we have this discussion every year, and nothing ever gets decided, but might as well try again. The "key games" section, doesn't it seem a little bit like original research and editor opinion? It's basically individual wikipedia editors deciding that a particular game was "key", usually just because it's either one of the teams they root for or because both of the teams had a ranking (just because they were both ranked does automatically make it an important game, and especially not "wiki-worthy"). Should we include this section this year? Two weeks into the season and it's almost as long as last years key games section Ryan2845 (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This section violates WP policy WP:No original research, one of Wikipedia's three core content policies. It's totally subjective as to what games are "key", and that kind of opinion does not belong in WP. There is no criteria for inclusion, and as such, it should be deleted. I'm deleting it now. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 15:40, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No one has responded to this but has re-added it to the article. I'm removing it again. This list is original research. Who determines what games are "key"? JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 13:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Ryan and JohnnyPolo. Good work removing the section. — X96lee15 (talk) 16:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I disagree, we have this discussion every year because it should be included. Who else is with me?--Levineps (talk) 05:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you can give a solid argument as to why it should be included and how it does not violate WP:No original research, i'd be interested in hearing it. But unless there is some unbiased, un-opinionated way to determine what games are "key games", then it should not be on wiki. Ryan2845 (talk) 07:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Proposal for the criteria. A game is included if it meets any of the following:
1) Game played between two teams ranked (at the time of the game) in either major poll
2) Game played between two teams who at the end of the season are ranked or finish with 10+ wins
3) Conference championship game —Ute in DC (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bowl Game[edit]

We should use this Template:


Bowl Championship Series
Date Bowl Game Site Team 1 Team 2 Score TV
January 1 Rose Bowl Game presented by citi Rose Bowl Stadium
Pasadena, CA		 Big Ten Champion Pac-10 Champion ABC
Allstate Sugar Bowl Louisiana Superdome
New Orleans, LA		 SEC Champion BCS At-Large FOX
January 4 Tostitos Fiesta Bowl University of Phoenix Stadium
Glendale, AZ		 Big 12 Champion BCS At-Large FOX
January 4 FedEx Orange Bowl Land Shark Stadium
Miami, FL		 ACC Champion BCS At-Large FOX


Rules Changes[edit]

Ultimately, these were the rules that were put in place:

  • 1-4-3a Visiting team may wear colored jerseys Page 31
  • 2-3-6 Blocking zone defined Page 45
  • 2-24-1 (deleted)Spearing definition eliminated Page 55
  • 2-33 Three-and-One Principle of penalty enforcement defined Page 62
  • 2-34 Tackle box defined Page 62
  • 3-2-3 No extension of period on loss-of-down penalty Page 67
  • 3-2-4 and 3-3-5 40-second play clock for Team B injury Page 68, 73
  • 9-1-2-q Chin strap included in face mask foul Page 119
  • 9-1-4 Roughing the kicker restricted to tackle box Page 120
  • 9-6 Mandatory conference review of flagrant fouls Page 132

REF: Rogers Redding, Secretary-Rules Editor, NCAA Football Rules Committee - NCAA Football 2009-10 Rules and Interpretations. THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION May 2009

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2009 NCAA Division I FBS football season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:49, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on 2009 NCAA Division I FBS football season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2009 NCAA Division I FBS football season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_season&oldid=1196547574"