Talk:2002 Sure for Men Rockingham 500

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Title?[edit]

Should this article be moved to "2002 Sure for Men Rockingham 500" to comply with the manual of style re: caps? ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:27, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: I'm for the idea. MWright96 (talk) 18:28, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:2002 Sure for Men Rockingham 500/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  17:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "in Corby, Northamptonshire, England, United Kingdom" - too much. I'd recommend removing United Kingdom
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No original research found.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Ha, I only listed one point this time. That's better than nothing! JAGUAR  13:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]