Talk:1Day Sooner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Submission decline and sigcov[edit]

Hi @User:Tom (LT), thanks for taking the time to review the submission. Highlighted in the table below are a few of the sources already in the article, showing it meets GNG requirements. Happy to discuss in more detail as well. (Note that some articles cited in this draft may erroneously write "1 Day Sooner" or "One Day Sooner", so a quick Ctrl+F may miss them.)

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Science, July 2020 Yes Yes Yes Five mentions by name, including discussion of its members and advocacy. Yes
ABC News, October 2020 Yes Yes Yes Four consecutive paragraphs about 1Day Sooner and its advocacy. Yes
Guardian, December 2020 Yes Yes Yes Four paragraphs describing 1Day Sooner, describing an interaction with the WHO, and quoting a representative. Yes
Vox, November 2022 Yes Yes Yes Several direct mentions of 1Day Sooner, and quotation of two of its representatives, regarding tuberculosis challenge trials. Yes
Vox, March 2021 Yes Yes Yes Extensive discussion of 1Day Sooner's volunteers, advocacy, and arguments made against its position on Covid-19 challenge trials in humans. Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 21:26, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

N.B. — Tom has been away for several weeks, so I opted to resubmit. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 14:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]