Talk:1993 amendments to the Constitution of Malaysia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Title[edit]

I'm not sure if the name of the article aptly describes the event.

First, how many amendments took place in 1983? The title does not refer to the specific event it touches on.

Secondly, "amendment" is wrongly spelled.

Thirdly, you said while moving the page that sources say it is hardly a crisis yet, you have not given the source. At the same time, several other sources cited in the page said that it is a constitutional crisis.__earth (Talk) 01:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My basis are found mainly from "Google books"--there are titles stating "1983 constitutional crisis",[1] "1988 constitutional crisis"[2] but barely one or two stating "1993 constitutional crisis" crisis:[3] (Note: Not the Russian one, but the Malaysian one) ammendment:http://books.google.com/books?q=1993+malaysia+%22constitutional+amendment%22&lr=&spell=1

You can perhaps try to search for web pages on google--which I did, and articles which I read from the star usually tend to refer to the 1983 and 1988 as constitutional crisis. The 1993 one is usually not really seen as one--one example in this article you can see [4] but it would be against wikipedia's guidelines to provide a whole list of sources arguing that it is a "constitutional crisis" or not.

For me, Im certain that most authors should have a considerable insight into what exactly happened when they would prefer to use "crisis" or not.

Usually, a constituional crisis occurs when the government cannot function as a result of constitutional disputes--as per Constitutional crisis. This isnt really like the 1988 condition whereby there is indeed problems with the judiciary--hence compromising the law. To me, to say the 1993 one is a "crisis" is very subjective. It would be better to play safe and take it as an "ammendment", since the main focus is on the event of the "ammendment" which is undisputable that it indeed took place, which most sources tend to stick to. Can, I feel the new name is better, after browsing the category of articles in Category:Constitutional amendments. Mr Tan (talk) 04:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reasons name change[edit]

Sorry, Hafiz, but I did get the original Bills--more than one bill is ammended--sources directly from parliament:[5][6] Nowhere 66 was ever stated.

You infered from [7] doesnt necessitate in article 66 ammended again in 1993 after 1983. One book source you can also check--66 not stated--not only Article 181 as well [8].

Regards Mr Tan (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The name should be fine now. __earth (Talk) 10:17, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1993 amendments to the Constitution of Malaysia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]