Talk:1953 Chinese census

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sources for improvement[edit]

China's Changing Population has analysis of the early census data as well as various studies performed in conjunction with them. — LlywelynII 10:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Languages of China in census[edit]

Why there is no census statistics for Languages of China--Kaiyr (talk) 06:44, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 14 August 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved all per nom. No such user (talk) 10:37, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Per WP:CONCISE. These names are too long. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:16, 14 August 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. — Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 16:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per WP:OFFICIALNAMES. The current titles are tedious and actually obscure understanding. — AjaxSmack 19:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 22:39, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support much more CONCISE. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 22:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.