Talk:1942 in baseball

Baseball High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baseball assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1942 in baseball/Comments (baseball), and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==Rating== After reviewing the material in the article (it more resembles a list), I don't think 1942 in Baseball is a stub article. On the contrary, it provides a some important information, such as the team standings in both MLB and the Negro leagues. It also provides the champions of each league and the MVPs. It is by no means a stub, but I don't think it has enough criteria to be regarded as B-class. It would be nice to get some photographs or even artwork from the era, but those images would need to originate from '42 and only '42. Limiting the dates of pictures and art to one year will make finding a sufficient number of images difficult. Yet some type of visual stimulation other than words is required I feel. I'm going to tag the article as start-class rated. Please, feel free to rebut me. Thanks Fdssdf (talk) 07:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 07:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)