Talk:1869 Atlantic hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1869 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 25, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 27, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 1869 Atlantic hurricane season was the earliest year in the Atlantic hurricane database in which there were at least ten tropical cyclones?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:1869 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 03:27, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found, now that work is done:

  • Tropical Storm Four says the track is unknown, yet the infobox picture shows the track quite clearly; I'm confused by the disparity.
  • Ref #1 is showing the publisher= thing on screen; fix that.

Only two issues I found. I'll put this on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:29, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I fixed the second thing. As for TS 4, it says the entire track is unknown, which is true. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:37, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
When I read that the entire track is unknown, then it implies in my mind that we don't know anything about it; the storm above it uses the same language yet has no track at all, which contributes to this confusion. I'd reword it to 'parts of the track or unknown' to make it clearer. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:41, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's not that important anyway, so I just removed that sentence in question. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. Article now passes GA status. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Cool! Thanks a lot. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:57, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Additional transclusions[edit]

From redirected 1860–1869 Atlantic hurricane seasons:

September Gale, 1869[edit]

The article indicates:

6. A hurricane was first observed northeast of the Bahamas on September 7. It strengthened to a Category 3 on the 8th, and it retained that intensity until its Rhode Island landfall on the 9th. It dissipated over northern Maine that night. The hurricane caused a great deal of damage in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Maine, but only caused one reported death.

If this is truly the case, then I can provide the name of the individual - James Ewell Williamson. My source is The Genealogies of Mayflower Families Volume 3 (1985 - available on Ancestry.com) is based off of the New England Historical and Genealogical Registers that were published in the 1920s. Williamson's record indicates that he was drowned off the Grand Banks in the famous "September Gale," 8 Sept 1869 --Speedy47 08:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we don't ever list the names of the deceased of tropical cyclones, unless I suppose they happen to kill someone famous. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1869 Atlantic hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]