Talk:1836 in rail transport

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Timelines task force.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was consensus is against move. JPG-GR (talk) 00:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1836 in rail transport → Rail transport in 1836 — completing incomplete request —Andrewa (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:RM:

1836 in rail transport → Rail transport in 1836 - The orig. title is not standard english syntax. I doubt anyone will search for an article in that manner. This will boost the article's visibility.Matthew Glennon (talk) 14:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Oppose. This name represents a well-established and widely used if unwritten convention. See for example Category:20th century in music. Andrewa (talk) 15:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. See Years in rail transport. Should be brought up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Trains for wider discussion, but will involve much work if all articles are changed. Llamasharmafarmerdrama (talk) 16:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Opppose Seems fine to me, also 'visaiblity' is not a valid reason for a move. We are not a search engine whore site or we would include 'anal fisting pee Dalek' at the bottom of all our pages. Narson (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
oppose per standard naming convention; see 1836 in poetry, 1836 in art, 1836 in science and 1836 in archaeology for other examples of this naming convention. Slambo (Speak) 10:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion[edit]

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.cityofperris.org/history.asp
- In Fred T. Perris on 2011-03-19 13:24:24, 404 Not Found
- In 1836 in rail transport on 2011-05-25 02:04:34, 404 Not Found
- In 1836 in rail transport on 2011-06-01 22:46:59, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]