Talk:1734 Tradition

Neopaganism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge[edit]

We do not have Gardnerian Wicca merged with Gerald Gardner, and there's enough about this path that is independent of Wilson, that i don't think this meeds to be merged. That being said, my number one reason for reverting the merge was that there was zero discussion.--Vidkun (talk) 18:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, there are 1734 groups like the Roebuck who have very little to do with Wilson. (Midnightblueowl (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

--Chad Joseph Wilson (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations and minor edits[edit]

This is not a minor edit. The entire ~~section~~ article now reads like an essay, not an encyclopedic entry, and requires citations.--Vidkun (talk) 19:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]