Talk:10.2 surround sound

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Professional sound production Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Professional sound production, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sound recording and reproduction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Professional sound productionWikipedia:WikiProject Professional sound productionTemplate:WikiProject Professional sound productionProfessional sound production articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Joke?[edit]

And to think at first I thought this was a joke... Thegline 22:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, it's for real - and it's an amazing experience. The name does lend itself to sarcasm, though... --Dennitzio 17:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup needed[edit]

This article really needs cleanup. Too much of it sounds like an advertisement. --218.234.101.44 11:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with this. 216.123.197.18 03:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. None of the information presented seems biased, and with one exception at the end, no commercial products are mentioned. 69.253.67.240 (talk) 02:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement[edit]

"There is no other system, for instance, that would allow an airplane to fly overhead while a bee encircles you at only a few feet away."
A critical ability of any sound system... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.164.60.24 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 4 June 2007 (UTC).[reply]

There are several such systems including 22.2 and Ambisonics. 216.123.197.21 20:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the article as the above extract is factually incorrect. 216.123.197.18 03:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not catching on?[edit]

Why is 5.1 still the standard and basically the best true format as 6.1 and 7.1 are just matrixed, with the exception of SDDS. Daniel Christensen (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There does exist a 6.1 DTS with a discrete back-center channel. As for 7.1, there are just "too many" possible channel layouts. KSM-2501ZX, IP address:= 200.226.98.252 (talk) 16:04, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Channel Order and Labels[edit]

It would be nice if this page had a section for the supported channel labels and numbers with their order. The 22.2 page has this, but seems to conflict with the supporting document. Please email me at cvanwink [ a t ] adobe.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.135.193 (talk) 14:25, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is 12.2 defined?[edit]

DTS Coherent Acoustics defines 10.2 surround but where does 12.2 come from? The article neither states a source nor is it clear whether this is already an established standard or a proposal or someone's personal home setup ;) --Mudd1 (talk) 12:38, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]