Talk:'S Up

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 'S Up article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

BBC: Sitcoms Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by BBC Sitcoms Task Force.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Categorized article[edit]

The category of this article, which I have personally categorized is a bit generalized. If anyone could have a more specific categorization of this article, the changes would be most welcomed. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 19:56, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Furry"[edit]

Removed the link to furry fandom, as I'm pretty sure that Eddie thought "Furry Honey-Pot Adventure" was about hairy vulvae, not furries. Falkybassist (talk) 18:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move to 'S Up[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
's Up → 'S Up — There was no consensus to move 'S Out, so let's try if this has enough support. It makes no sense for the two similar titles to be spelt differently. The British Sitcom Guide uses a capital S for this title, although IMDb uses "'s Up" (they capitalize "'S Out", though, which makes no sense at all either way). As I pointed out in the earlier discussion, 'S Wonderful (which has a lot more available sources and a similar situation) is pretty consistently capitalized by sources. So, move this one to 'S Up? Jafeluv (talk) 17:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This does not require a move, only a removal of the {{lowercase}} template. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 18:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There's no {{lowercase}} in the article. Jafeluv (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right, because the first character is a ' not an s. – ukexpat (talk) 20:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Duplicate article[edit]

There is another article for this episode on Wikipedia: Bottoms_Up_(Bottom_episode). It should be merged with this one, but I don't know how to do that. Please help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.248.143.21 (talk) 13:09, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]