Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co.
| Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co. | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 21, 1961 Decided June 12, 1961 | |
| Full case name | Jarecki, former Collector of Internal Revenue, et al. v. G.D. Searle & Co. |
| Citations | 367 U.S. 303 (more) 81 S. Ct. 1579; 6 L. Ed. 2d 859; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 2149 |
| Holding | |
| Income resulting from the manufacture and sale of certain patented drugs, cameras, camera equipment and stereo products resulting from inventions is not included within the statutory definition of "abnormal income," in 456 (a), so as to qualify for Korean War excess profits tax relief under the Excess Profits Tax Act of 1950. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Warren |
Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co., 367 U.S. 303 (1961), was a U.S. Supreme Court case.[1]
Jarecki is an example of the maxim noscitur a sociis—a word is known by the company it keeps. The Court noted that noscitur a sociis is not an inescapable rule. It further noted that the maxim is often wisely applied where a word is capable of many meanings. The reason that it is applied in the case of many meanings is that it avoids giving unintended breadth to Acts of Congress.
See also[edit]
External links[edit]
Works related to Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co. at Wikisource- ^ Text of Jarecki v. G.D. Searle & Co., 367 U.S. 303 (1961) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |