Draft talk:Thomas Goodrich

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This page is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States

This page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.

United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Contested deletion[edit]

I contend that the article in question should not be subjected to speedy deletion for the following reasons, which are firmly rooted in Wikipedia's core content policies:

Notability and Verifiable Sources: The subject of the article, an author who has published almost a dozen books, clearly meets Wikipedia's notability criteria for authors. These works have been widely reviewed online, indicating significant coverage by independent sources (see Wikipedia:Notability (people) and Wikipedia:Notability (books)). The presence of such reviews in reputable publications or platforms can be easily verified, aligning with Wikipedia's verifiability policy.

Contribution to Knowledge and Public Discourse: The author's invitations to speak at symposiums due to his niche historical knowledge further underscore his notability and relevance. These engagements signify recognition by the academic and professional communities, further establishing the subject's prominence in his field.

Editorial Bias and Misuse of Deletion Policy: The request for speedy deletion, accompanied by biased comments from the submitter, suggests a potential misuse of Wikipedia's deletion policy for non-neutral purposes. Wikipedia's policies on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:No personal attacks are clear that content disputes should not devolve into personal biases or attacks. The motivations behind the deletion request, especially if politically motivated, should not influence the article's standing, which ought to be judged solely on its adherence to Wikipedia's standards of notability and verifiability.

In light of these points, I argue for the retention and improvement of the article, rather than its deletion. Wikipedia's guidelines encourage the development of content that enriches the encyclopedia, provided it meets notability and neutrality criteria. The deletion of this article would not only disregard the notability of the author's contributions to literature and historical discourse but also undermine the principles of neutrality and fairness that Wikipedia espouses. --skarz (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]