This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This page is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Following up on a discussion from the Women in Red page, do folks think we should move the "Honors and Recognition" section from this article to the talk page (or just offline potentially), so that we can save that section for inclusion AFTER the draft is submitted? I'm wondering if that (in combination with new secondary source material AFTER June 2023) will help to demonstrate notability with less sources. Again, just a thought, and I'd certainly defer to folks like @Cielquiparle, @Ɱ, and @Asilvering who have more experience and who have also been working on this page. Pumpkinspyce (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No need to move anything to the talk page, so long as you remember what revision the stuff was last in - you can always go back into article history and copy something back in once it's been removed. -- asilvering (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's a good point, and I didn't even think about that. Thanks so much, @Asilvering! Pumpkinspyce (talk) 00:59, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
