Draft:YellowfinBI
Submission declined on 8 September 2023 by Stuartyeates (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 13 July 2023 by Artem.G (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Artem.G 10 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 June 2023 by Rich Smith (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Rich Smith 11 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 16 June 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 11 months ago. | |
Comment: I was asked by email to look at this again. I can't access some sources due to "disable your adblocker" messages but everything else is articles that quote company officers. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources are not even close. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: No reliable sources. The ones given are either PR fluff or trivial reporting - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
YellowfinBI is a Business Intelligence Software vendor headquartered in Austin, Texas, specializing in Embedded Analytics solutions.
History[edit]
YellowfinBI was founded in 2003 in Melbourne, Australia, by Glenn Rabie and Justin Hewitt, with Glenn Rabie as CEO, and launched global operations in 2008.
In 2011 Yellowfin launched a partnership with UK-based BI company DSCallards, later acquired by Codestone, to make Yellowfin’s BI solutions available to DSCallards customers.
In 2014 YellowfinBI supplied the software behind BMC’s Smart Reporting ITSM solution.
In 2016 YellowfinBI partnered with Volpara Health to develop medical screening solutions. In March of 2017 YellowfinBI partnered with global shipping and mailing company Pitney Bowes to deliver a business intelligence tool for Pitney Bowes customers.
In 2022 YellowfinBI was acquired by Idera Corporation, a private software company with brands providing data tools, developer tools and DevOps tools. YellowfinBI retained its brand identity.[1]
Platform[edit]
Yellowfin BI is a Business Intelligence Platform built on a scalable Java core with JavaScript UX. Yellowfin BI works with data in existing sources, including JDBC compliant databases such as SQLServer, Oracle, Exasol, Snowflake, Redshift, XML/A compliant cubes such as Microsoft Analysis Services, SAP BW, Oracle Essbase, CSV files (which are then loaded in to a relational database), and third-party sources including applications like Salesforce.com and Google Analytics.
References[edit]
- ^ "Yellowfin acquired by B2B software specialist Idera". TechTarget. 31 Jan 2022.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.