Draft:Mwnabili
| Submission rejected on 19 November 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by KylieTastic 6 months ago. Last edited by Citation bot 13 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Theroadislong 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 November 2023 by Utopes (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Utopes 6 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 18 November 2023 by Vanderwaalforces (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Vanderwaalforces 6 months ago.
| |
Comment: poorly sourced promotional garbage. Theroadislong (talk) 08:49, 21 November 2023 (UTC)- Comment: Tedious re-submissions with no improvement just wasting everyone's times KylieTastic (talk) 15:51, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: "Tourist attraction place" is not a recognised geographical feature, therefore this probably needs to be reframed or else satisfy WP:GNG. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Going to need a bit better sourcing, because "spectacular" is not written from a neutral point of view. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:59, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
|placeS in Assam}}
Mwnabili | |
|---|---|
Tourist attraction place | |
 | |
| Country |  India |
| State | Assam |
| Demonym | Boro/Nepali/Assamese |
| Languages | |
| • Official | Boro/Assamese |
| Time zone | UTC+5:30 (IST) |
| ISO 3166 code | IN-AS-26 |
Mwnabili is a small tourist place located in Malivita,Chirang district, near Gelephu, on the Indo-Bhutan border. It is surrounded by spectacular sceneries with crystal clear on the bank of river.[1][2]
Etymology[edit]
The word Mwnabili word is described from Boro (बर'/बड़ो [bɔɽo]) Mwna means "Night" and Bili means" Evening".
Gallery[edit]
- ^ "Mwnabili Picnic Spot & Eco Tourism". Retrieved 19 April 2023.
- ^ "Mwnabili Picnic Spot & Eco Tourism". Retrieved 21 April 2023.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.