Draft:Martha's Rule

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Martha Mills (2007-2021)

Martha's Rule is a patient safety initiative implemented in NHS English hospitals from April 2024. It gives patients, families, carers and staff in hospitals who have concerns about a deteriorating patient's treatment round-the-clock access to a rapid review from a separate care team.[1] NHS chief executive Amanda Pritchard said the programme would undoubtedly 'save lives in the future'.[2] According to Henrietta Hughes, the Patient Safety Commissioner for England, it is also intended as a 'cultural intervention', which will help to flatten hierarchies within medicine, improve listening on the part of clinicians and give patients and their families greater agency.[3]

Background[edit]

The origins of Martha's Rule lie in the patient safety activism of Merope Mills, whose daughter, Martha Mills, died in hospital a few days before her 14th birthday, on 31 August 2021.[4] Merope Mills is a journalist, currently the editor of The Guardian Saturday magazine and a Guardian executive editor. In September 2022, on what would have been Martha's 15th birthday, Mills wrote about Martha and her treatment at King's College Hospital (KCH), in south London, in an article for the Guardian,[5] which was widely read all over the world[4] and has become a text studied in medical schools.[6] A year later, in September 2023, Mills gave an interview on the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, telling the story of Martha's treatment and making the case for Martha's Rule.[7] Within a day of the broadcast, Martha’s Rule was discussed in the House of Commons. Within a fortnight, the Conservative government had backed the initiative[8] and the Labour Party in opposition had also expressed support, the Shadow Secretary of State for Health Wes Streeting having said that he was moved to tears by the BBC interview.[9] Within two weeks, the Times,[10] Daily Telegraph,[11] Guardian[12] and Daily Mail ('A second opinion', 7 September 2023) had followed suit with leading articles expressing their backing of the campaign. The British Medical Journal ran several pieces on Martha's Rule and the editor-in-chief wrote in support of the initiative.[13]

Henrietta Hughes, the Patient Safety Commissioner, has written that the 'tragic death of Martha is a clear example of epistemic injustice, where the views and voices of patients are not heard and acted on. The information and insights from Martha’s parents were not believed, were undervalued, or were not understood – but it is not an isolated case.'[3] Martha Mills's was a preventable death from septic shock, following a series of hospital mistakes.[14] She had a treatable pancreatic injury following a holiday bike accident. Martha had a bed for several weeks on Rays of Sunshine Ward, KCH; King's is a specialist referral centre for the treatment of pancreatic trauma, and she was treated by the hospital's paediatric liver team.[15] Rays of Sunshine is well-funded, with a portion of its money coming from private overseas liver transplant patients.[16]

KCH's own Serious Incident Investigation Report – on which Mills drew in writing her Guardian piece – noted that Martha was kept on the ward as she deteriorated, even though there were five occasions when it would have been appropriate to involve paediatric intensive care (PICU).[16] Had she been moved to PICU, where a bed was available, observation and treatment would have different.[17] The Serious Incident Investigation Report noted that there were poor relations between the 'high-status' liver team working on Rays of Sunshine and paediatric intensive care: the liver team had a reputation for being dismissive of their colleagues in PICU.[5] In 2022, a coroner ruled that Martha would most likely have survived if KCH's liver team had transferred her to PICU.[17] King's College Hospital has admitted breach of duty of care.[16] The hospital trust apologised for the mistakes made, and said in a statement that it 'remains deeply sorry that we failed Martha when she needed us most'.[18]

In her Guardian article, Mills wrote that although she had, along with Martha's father, Paul Laity, raised concerns about Martha's deterioration, her opinions were ignored or dismissed by the consultants and junior doctors on Rays of Sunshine Ward at KCH.[5] The article recounted that Martha developed severe sepsis six days before she died, one symptom of which was that she bled copiously from the tubes in her arms and stomach.[19] But her parents were never told she had sepsis, and other symptoms were kept from them and left untreated.[5]

Following the significant public response to the Guardian article, Mills and Laity were asked by the think-tank Demos to work jointly on a patient safety initiative designed to learn from Martha's death.[20] After research and a meeting with NHS representatives and other health stakeholders, the decision was taken to concentrate on Martha's Rule. Mills had been approached by health workers in Australia, who told her about Ryan's Rule, a similar patient safety process in Queensland, Australia,[21] which provided the inspiration for the name Martha's Rule.[22] Martha's Rule also draws on Call 4 Concern, an initiative introduced in a number of British hospitals.[1] Evidence shows that such initiatives are not overused or abused by patients or families, and can result in necessary escalations which would otherwise not have occurred.[14]

Mills has argued that Martha's Rule will not only save lives but bring about a significant shift in the culture within hospitals towards patient power.[23] Mills said of her experience at Martha's bedside: 'I was "managed", I hadn’t been listened to and I felt powerless ... If a patient and family escalation system such as Martha’s rule had existed – and had been clearly advertised around the hospital with posters and stickers – I’m sure I would have used it and it could well have saved Martha’s life.'[24] Mills called for an increase in patient and family agency in a hospital environment – something long supported in principle by the NHS.[25]

Some doubts were expressed in advance of the implementation of Martha's Rule regarding any attempt to frame it as the 'right' to a second opinion, which would be 'practically and conceptually fraught'.[26] It was also argued in the context of the initiative's aim to change medical culture that 'not all power imbalances' within the medical world 'are automatically and uniformly problematic'.[26] In addition, 'requesting a second opinion exemplifies a lack of trust, and perhaps even distrust, in the clinical team'.[26] In March 2024, the Royal College of Physicians and the British Medical Association welcomed Martha's Rule. But Dr Vishal Sharma, chair of the BMA’s consultants committee, argued that significant resource implications arose from its roll-out, given a perceived crisis in the NHS and existing staff shortages: 'For this to result in improvements for patients, it is essential that the current workforce crisis is addressed so that critical care outreach teams have the necessary staff they need to deliver this initiative. More must also be done to embed a supportive culture across the NHS where staff know they can speak up about problems and have time to listen to families and others when issues arise.'[27]

Implementation[edit]

In September 2023, the then Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Steve Barclay, asked Henrietta Hughes, the Patient Safety Commissioner to work on an implementation plan for Martha's Rule. After four 'sprint' meetings involving NHS Trusts, the Health Ombudsman, the CQC, the GMC, the Patients' Association and other bodies, Hughes submitted her recommendations to the Secretary of State on 20 October 2023.[28] The following month, Merope Mills spoke at the NHS England chief nurses's summit.[29] Mills wrote of Martha's Rule in the British Medical Journal: 'I realise its introduction has come at a time of crisis in the NHS. But as many supportive doctors have told me, such an escalation system ... protects patients and overstretched healthcare professionals alike. Doctors and nurses are under great pressure, but this is exactly when Martha’s Rule is needed most.'[30]

On 21 February 2024, NHS England and the Department of Health announced that the roll-out of Martha's Rule would begin with 100 hospitals – acute provider sites which already have round-the-clock critical care outreach capability – from April 2024 to March 2025.[1] According to Victoria Atkins, the Secretary of State for Health, the 'introduction of Martha’s Rule from April will put families at the heart of the patient’s own care, recognising the critical role they have in the treatment of loved ones'.[2] The work completed at the initial sites will inform the development of wider national policy proposals for Martha’s Rule.[1] On 2 April the General Medical Council, Nursing and Midwifery Council, and Care Quality Commission issued a joint statement expressing their support for the implementation of Martha’s Rule by NHS England.[31] The organisations stated that 'Martha’s Rule reinforces the fundamental principles of listening to people who use health and care services and their families, and acting on what they say.'[31]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d NHS England (21 February 2024). "Martha's Rule".
  2. ^ a b NHS England (21 February 2024). "NHS to Roll-Out Martha's Rule".
  3. ^ a b Hughes, Henrietta (20 October 2023). "Recommendations on Martha's Rule implementation go to government". Patient Safety Commissioner: Listening to Patients.
  4. ^ a b Pidd, Helen (11 September 2023). "How the death of Martha Mills sparked a movement for change". Guardian.
  5. ^ a b c d Mills, Merope (3 September 2022). "'We had such trust, we feel such fools': how shocking hospital mistakes led to our daughter's death". Guardian.
  6. ^ Laity, Paul (27 August 2023). "Can I Forgive Myself for My Daughter's Death?". Guardian.
  7. ^ BBC News (4 September 2023). "Martha's rule: Government to explore bringing in change after tragic teen death". BBC News.
  8. ^ Davies, Caroline (14 September 2023). "Government backs Martha's rule on right to second medical opinion in England". Guardian.
  9. ^ Grierson, Jamie (5 September 2023). "Labour backs call for 'Martha's rule' on right to second medical opinion". Guardian.
  10. ^ "The Times view on the case of Martha Mills: Martha's Rule". The Times. 5 September 2023.
  11. ^ "Patients have a right to a second opinion: Medical staff are fallible. Martha's Rule is a necessary intervention". Telegraph. 5 September 2023.
  12. ^ "The Guardian view on Martha's Rule: boosting patient power could save lives". Guardian. 5 September 2023.
  13. ^ Abbasi, Kamran (12 October 2023). "Martha's rule: an undeniable right to a second medical opinion". BMJ. 383: 2351. doi:10.1136/bmj.p2351.
  14. ^ a b "Martha's Rule: A new policy to amplify patient voice and improve safety in hospitals". Demos. 2023-09-04. Retrieved 2023-12-28.
  15. ^ Thomas, Rebecca (21 February 2024). "NHS to roll out 'Martha's rule' following 13-year old's death". The Independent.
  16. ^ a b c Today in Focus podcast (21 February 2024). "Why the NHS Needs Martha's Rule". Guardian.
  17. ^ a b Siddique, Haroon (4 March 2022). "Girl, 13, likely to have survived if moved to intensive care, coroner rules". Guardian.
  18. ^ Kirby, Jane (4 September 2023). "Martha Mills: Parents of girl who died after NHS mistakes call for new right to get second opinion". The Independent.
  19. ^ Sylvester, Rachel (5 September 2023). "We were powerless, we were told so little — and Martha died". The Times.
  20. ^ "Martha's Rule: A New Policy to Amplify Patient Voice and Improve Safety in Hospitals" (PDF). Demos. 9 September 2023.
  21. ^ Hinchliffe, John (8 September 2023). "Ryan's rule: the Australian right to a second medical opinion that may soon be saving lives in England". The Guardian.
  22. ^ Best of Today. "Martha's Rule to Start in Hospitals". BBC Sounds.
  23. ^ Mundasad, Smitha (4 September 2023). "Martha's rule: Call for right to second opinion after tragic teen death". BBC.
  24. ^ "Martha's Rule: Challenging culture will make our hospitals safer". BBC. 4 September 2023.
  25. ^ Sylvester, Rachel (18 November 2023). "Toxic doctors put patients at risk, says NHS watchdog". The Times.
  26. ^ a b c Graham, Mackenzie (6 January 2024). "Getting rights right: implementing 'Martha's Rule'". Journal of Medical Ethics. doi:10.1136/jme-2023-109650. PMID 38184371.
  27. ^ Houston, Dr Muiris (17 March 2024). "The challenge of implementing 'Martha's rule'". The Medical Independent.
  28. ^ Hughes, Henrietta (20 October 2023). "Martha's Rule: Recommendations".
  29. ^ Church, Ed (16 November 2023). "Martha's Rule: Family felt 'failed' by nurses as well as doctors". Nursing Times.
  30. ^ Mills, Merope (9 October 2023). "Martha's rule: a hospital escalation system to save patients' lives". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.). 383: 2319. doi:10.1136/bmj.p2319. PMID 37813419.
  31. ^ a b Sutcliffe, Andrea; Massey, Charlie; Trenholm, Ian (2 April 2024). "Joint statement on Martha's Rule from the GMC, NMC, and CQC". GMC Online.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)