Draft:IACG Multimedia College

Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,552 pending submissions waiting for review.

If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Reviewer tools

Instructions · What links here · IACG Multimedia College (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Bing, Wikipedia) · Submitted 11 days ago by Knowmore.ch24 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 10 days ago by Citation bot

Submission declined on 29 April 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by DoubleGrazing 12 days ago. Last edited by Citation bot 10 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 25 April 2024 by CanonNi (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by CanonNi 16 days ago.

Comment: Doesn't cite a single source that contributes towards notability, and we need to see several. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Comment: Also note that Wikipedia articles are not considered reliable sources per WP:CIRCULAR. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 11:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

IACG Multimedia College^[1], officially known as the International Academy of Computer Graphics, is an educational institution based in India that specializes in multimedia and creative arts. Founded in 2002, the college was established with the aim of providing innovative education in arts and multimedia to address the conventional approaches prevalent in existing institutions.

Overview[edit]

IACG Multimedia College offers a range of undergraduate and post graduate programs, including four-year undergraduate and two-year postgraduate degrees with specializations in Animation, Visual Effects, Game Design & Game development, Film Making, Art & Design, and Graphic Design. The college prides itself on a curriculum designed to foster deep discovery of students' innate abilities and interests, encouraging them to explore and develop their skills in a supportive environment.

Educational Philosophy[edit]

The institution's philosophy is centered around disrupting the traditional educational norms by providing personalized and industry-relevant training. This approach aims to enable students to find their true calling and develop into next-generation talent within the global creative arts industry. The college emphasizes practical, production-level training delivered by industry specialists, ensuring that students gain real-world experience during their studies.

Accreditations and Recognition[edit]

IACG offered Graduation & Post Graduation Programs in collaboration with Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad since 2006^[2]. Further, in 2019, IACG Multimedia College has got the affiliation with Jawaharlal Nehru Architecture & Fine Arts University^[3] offering UG, PG and Diploma Programs with disciplines in Animation, Visual Effects,Game Design & Game development, Film Making, Art & Design, and Graphic Design.

IACG Multimedia College has been recognized as a Rookies Certified School in 2024^[4], an accolade that underscores its commitment to excellence in arts education^[5]. This certification highlights the college's effectiveness in preparing students for successful careers in creative industries, serving as a benchmark of quality within the educational sector.