Constitutional pluralism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Constitutional pluralism is a legal doctrine dealing with real or perceived conflicts between national constitutions and international law, as enshrined in treaties, international dispute resolution mechanisms, or the European Union.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The doctrine has received criticism due to its perceived abuse by states undergoing autocratization such as Poland and Hungary in the late 2010s.[7][8]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Avbelj, Matej; Komárek, Jan, eds. (2012). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84731-891-6.
  2. ^ Bobić, Ana (2017). "Constitutional Pluralism Is Not Dead: An Analysis of Interactions Between Constitutional Courts of Member States and the European Court of Justice". German Law Journal. 18 (6): 1395–1428. doi:10.1017/S2071832200022380.
  3. ^ Stone Sweet, Alec (2012). "A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe". Global Constitutionalism. 1 (1): 53–90. doi:10.1017/S2045381711000062. S2CID 154605211.
  4. ^ Walker, Neil (2002). "The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism". Modern Law Review. 65 (3): 317–359. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00383. hdl:1814/179.
  5. ^ Jaklic, Klemen (2013). Constitutional Pluralism in the EU. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-100894-8.
  6. ^ Avbelj, Matej; Komárek, Jan (2008). "Four Visions of Constitutional Pluralism". European Constitutional Law Review. 4 (3): 524–527. doi:10.1017/S1574019608005245. hdl:1814/9372. S2CID 145588740.
  7. ^ "Constitutional Pluralism between Normative Theory and Empirical Fact". Verfassungsblog. 23 October 2018. Retrieved 8 December 2020.
  8. ^ Kelemen, R. Daniel; Pech, Laurent (2019). "The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland" (PDF). Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 21: 59–74. doi:10.1017/cel.2019.11. S2CID 211316174.