Category talk:German World War I flying aces

	Biography portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This category is supported by the military biography work group.

Aviation: Biography

	Aviation portal This category is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This category is supported by the aerospace biography project.

Military history: Aviation / Biography / European / German / World War I

This category is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

The missing German aces.[edit]

Hello, all,

This "list" contains only 164 of the approximately 400 German aces. It will never become complete, because there will be never be any links to articles written on non-notable aces. Thus, this category page is not truly a list.

I have severed the link to Lists of World War I flying aces because of this. All other lists connecting to this master list are complete or capable of completion. Because this one is not, it is deceptive and inaccurate.

Georgejdorner (talk) 00:41, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]