Category talk:Biography articles needing attention

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBiography Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

I am way deeper into the bowels[edit]

of wikipedia than i normally care to go. However something is happening at Isamu Noguchi that is confusing and somewhat upsetting to me and i think that it would be great if someone competent looked at it, figured out where half the article went, decided on what's okay there and what is not, and then did it. Life is supposed to be fun. Carptrash 18:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Al Sharpton bio[edit]

I hope I am at the right place to call something to Wikipedia's attention. I was looking at Al Sharpton's biography and found this comment in the third paragraph under "Early Years"... (see the last two sentences)

"He graduated from Samuel J. Tilden High School in Brooklyn, and attended Brooklyn College, dropping out after two years in 1975.[11] Sharpton became a tour manager for James Brown, in 1971, where he met his future wife, Kathy Jordan, a backup singer. Sharpton and Jordan married in 1983.[12] AL sharpton is a man that tries to speak for blacks and makes us sound stupid and he needs to shut up. Everything is not an issue of race so stop talking like every issue in the world is strictly based on race."

Hope Wikipedia can address this quickly.

Pjbristolwright 02:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has since been removed. You can remove future vandalism as you see them; Wikipedia:Vandalism explains how. Resurgent insurgent 10:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a lot of help. There is plagiarism, it focuses on wording from some weird webpage, especially the accident and death sections, omits much of his work, and family life, etc. Reading it is painful because the writing style is so amateurish. I am not qualified to fix it either, but I can tell it's not encyclopedic material. Talk:Montgomery Clift DHCpepper (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]