This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This category is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
I suggest we broaden the scope of this category to include airfields, private and public, and airstrips too, even if they are not general aviation airfields to include flying fields for remote controlled planes, or any airstrip with a runway longer than 300 feet or something like that to be more illusionist and state this on the category brief that this doesn't necessarily denote that the place is a "real" airport.MY♥INchile 18:19, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This category is under Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation and its subproject Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports. The precedent is already long-since established to require an airport to minimally have an ICAO, IATA and/or FAA airport code in order to begin the process of even starting an airport article. You've been told this before such as on Talk:Breuner_Airfield. Please do not repeatedly bring up the same topic on various article and category talk pages like you have been doing on a daily basis. It amounts to a campaign of proof by assertion and is disruptive editing due to the time it wastes for other editors to point out that you've already been told this standard exists on Wikipedia. (Note: this is the same response posted to the same question in Category talk:Airports in California.) Ikluft (talk) 07:25, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]