This category is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This category is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
@Fgnievinski: I do not dispute that "Aerial photography is the taking of photographs of the ground from an elevated/direct-down position", but geographic data and information is "data and information having an implicit or explicit association with a location relative to the Earth". In the context of "geographic data and information", location is a specific location within a spatial reference system, eg latitude/longitude - it's more specific than just "above the ground, looking down", which is all that is required for something to be aerial photography. If I take a photo from the air it is aerial photography, but if I do not also record the location it is not "Geographic data and information". Mitch Ames (talk) 13:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The ISO definition does allow for implicit association, no?
Yes, implied association with a location relative to the Earth. For the purposes of categorising as "geographic data and information" I don't think that "the ground" alone is sufficient as a "location". It's true that some aerial photography is geo-located, but there's nothing in the definition of "aerial photography" that requires geo-location, so "aerial photography" in general is not a sub-category of "geographic data and information". Mitch Ames (talk) 07:20, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
