Amanab language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Amanab
RegionAmanab District, Sandaun Province, Papua New Guinea
Native speakers
4,400 (2003)[1]
Border
  • Bewani Range
    • Bapi River
      • Amanab
Latin
Language codes
ISO 639-3amn
Glottologaman1265
ELPAmanab
Coordinates: 3°35′00″S 141°12′54″E / 3.583417°S 141.214903°E / -3.583417; 141.214903 (Amanab District H/Q))
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Amanab is a Papuan language spoken by 4,400 people in Amanab District (3°35′00″S 141°12′54″E / 3.583417°S 141.214903°E / -3.583417; 141.214903 (Amanab District H/Q)), Sandaun Province, Papua New Guinea.

Dialects are Eastern, Northern, and Western.[2]

Phonology[edit]

Vowels[edit]

Front Back
High i u
Mid ɛ ɔ
Low ɑ

Consonants[edit]

Labial Coronal Dorsal
Nasal m n
Plosive prenasalized ᵐb ⁿd ᵑɡ
voiceless p t k
Fricative ɸ s h
voiced ɣ
Approximant/Flap w l~ɾ j

Pronouns[edit]

The Amanab pronouns are:[3]

singular dual plural
1st person exclusive ka ka-ningri ka-ger
inclusive bi-ningri bi-ger
2nd person ne ne-ningri ne-nger
3rd person ehe ehe-ningri ehe-nger

Syntax[edit]

In Amanab, subordinate clauses are linked using the topic marker suffix -ba.[3]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Amanab at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
  2. ^ Steer, Martin (2005). Languages of the Upper Sepik and Central New Guinea (PDF). Canberra: Australian National University.
  3. ^ a b Foley, William A. (2018). "The Languages of the Sepik-Ramu Basin and Environs". In Palmer, Bill (ed.). The Languages and Linguistics of the New Guinea Area: A Comprehensive Guide. The World of Linguistics. Vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. pp. 197–432. ISBN 978-3-11-028642-7.
  • Minch, Andrew (1992). "Amanab grammar essentials". In John R. Roberts (ed.). Namia and Amanab grammar essentials. Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages, 39. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics. pp. 99–173.