User talk:Rancid Boar

Rancid Boar, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Rancid Boar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Binksternet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Swastika seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't change the English word "swastika" to the German word "hakenkreuz", as if hakenkreuz is an English word. The swastika is the same symbol in every language. Binksternet (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem at Strafgesetzbuch section 86a where you changed the English word to the German word. Stop doing that. Binksternet (talk) 19:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly misinformed. The swastika is not the same word in every language. Swastika is specifically a Sanskrit word and religious symbol. Every language and culture has its own variant amd use. The Nazi German word is specifically the Hakenkreuzor hooked cross. That is not the same as the swastika. The Japanese Buddhist is called the manji, the chinese buddhist is called the wan. Use the specific nomenclature and symbol. Rancid Boar (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your argument fails to say what word is used in English, which is of course swastika, a loanword borrowed from Sanskrit. The English language never adopted the German word. Since this is English language Wikipedia, we will use the English language terms. Any attempts to change that will be considered tendentious editing, and are subject to review and perhaps a block.

You also failed to show that the symbol is somehow different between Nazi Germany and other places. Such an attempt will never succeed, because the Germans originally picked up the symbol from their archaeological expeditions in Persia. The Nazi symbol came from Asia. It's the same symbol. Binksternet (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All you're doing is gatekeeping misinformation. Nazis specifically called their symbol the Hakenkreuz, it has its own historical meaning and significance. It means "hooked cross" in English. Yet English is irrelevant in this debate, since neither the German Hakenkreuz or Sanskrit Swastika are English words or direct translations. Use the words that were historically used by specific parties, not misappropriations used after WWII. The Nazis specifically called that symbol the Hakenkreuz this is a fact not tendentious editing. The Nazi symbol didn't come from Persia or Asia. It was adopted from European Christian hooked cross. Find and link a primary source where the Nazi Germans called the symbol the Swastika, and not the Hakenkreuz. In the Mein Kampf and various Nazi works, they specifically called the symbol the Hakenkreuz. Do some more research on the topic before forming a definitive stance and dismissing historical accuracy. Rancid Boar (talk) 01:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see your arguments are not backed up by WP:Reliable sources about the Nazi swastika supposedly NOT coming from Persia or Asia. Empty assertions have no leverage. Binksternet (talk) 05:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Visioncurve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hephthalites, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 03:07, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Turkic peoples, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Visioncurve^{Timendi causa est nescire} 03:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your vision must be off. Use a counter curvature lens glasses Rancid Boar (talk) 06:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Maurya Empire, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 12:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 08:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite clear that you aren't here to edit collaboratively or follow our policies but instead to promote your agenda. If this behavior continues then your editing privileges will be withdrawn. —SpacemanSpiff 08:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added content with citations. Instead of gatekeeping dubious citations, use relevant references that are not racially motivated. Rancid Boar (talk) 08:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]