User talk:Iwaqarhashmi

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. If I notice that you have been active but have not responded, I may place {{Talkback|Iwaqarhashmi}} on your page in case you have missed my response.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Reminder to all Wikipedians, vandalism on this talk page will be reverted and logged immediately, and if you need general help and I cannot respond in like 10 minutes, please contact someone else or go to the Teahouse. Reminder, this page is being archived by Cluebot III; do not reply to any archived messages as they will be ignored; if you want to revive messages that are more than two days old, please create a new topic as they are archived.

Stella (Trane) Jackson[edit]

Hello. I would like to point out that all of the newspaper articles mentioned in this draft are strictly talking about Stella (Trane) Jackson and her life story, which is where we got our information. Adsimmel (talk) 15:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, verifying the information can be challenging since the mentioned newspaper articles don't appear to be readily available online, making independent confirmation difficult.

Would it be possible to find alternative sources like @Qcne said? Waqar💬 15:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be able to find copies on an online newspaper archive? Qcne (talk) 15:40, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All of the newspaper articles are in the La Crosse library archives. If I were to include this site in my reference list would that satisfy? Adsimmel (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Iwaqarhashmi I'm of the opinion that if this is submitted again with those sources being offline, we'll just have to wait for a reviewer to get access to the sources to verify. This may take several months. I'd be happy to add some context to the submission. What do you think? Qcne (talk) 16:08, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne I absolutely agree. Adding context to the submission upfront would be very helpful for the reviewer, and also, waiting for access to the sources is a reasonable approach, even if it takes some time. Waqar💬 16:47, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what does this mean for my next submission? Do I submit what I have now? Maybe include a reference to the library archives? Or do I need to wait on something? Adsimmel (talk) 17:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Adsimmel, you don't have to submit right now. While you can submit what you have so far, it would be beneficial to strengthen your draft with additional sources before resubmitting. Consider including references from the library archives or alternative sources to make the review process much smoother for everyone involved. Waqar💬 17:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a comment to the draft, @Adsimmel. You can submit and a reviewer with access to those archives may come along in a few months to review it. If you can find the clippings on one of the many online newspaper archives (even ones you have to pay to access), then even better. Qcne (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Garten of banban[edit]

Hey there,

The information and sources posted about the recent article creation of the Garten of banban is relatively accurate. Just like most video games, Most of the lore and plot is only gathered by gameplay footage. LennySindacco (talk) 22:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]