Talk:Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2012)

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article lacks notability. I am proposing it for deletion.

--Andy0093 (talk) 15:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't disagree more. This case, heard by the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday, affects the Constitutional right of property owners to build a home on their land, as well as the Due Process rights of property owners to go to court and sue the EPA when the agency issues a "Compliance Order" prohibiting development on land that the EPA, in its sole discretion, deems to be "wetlands". This is an important property-rights case. Captain Quirk (talk) 11:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Captain Quirk. It's an important case and a basic Google search would show numerous news articles indicating notability. Of course, in case this article were nominated for deletion via WP:AFD, I am fairly certain it would result in a speedy keep. But why go through the trouble? I encourage anyone who reads this to help improve all U.S. Supreme Court case articles (check out Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases).--Cdogsimmons (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

I've added the SCOTUS infobox but I'm not sure about some of the finer details such as the citation numbers, so I've left it hidden until I can find those. However, if someone else wants to fill them in, go right ahead. --Kevin W./Talk•CFB uniforms/Talk 01:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]