Talk:Lithium-titanate battery

Energy High‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics Mid‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Honda Fit#Fit EV|Fit EV]] The anchor (#Fit EV) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Lithium-titanate battery are being showcased in the new lightning car. [1]

Unit consistency[edit]

When comparing Titanate and standard technology the articles compares Wh/kg (energy per weight) and Wh/L (energy per volume), any chance someone can find the same data in the same units? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.130.239.161 (talk) 11:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The practical result was delete and redirect.

Merger proposal[edit]

I'm proposing a merger of the information in SCIB into Lithium-titanate battery. SCiB is just a brand name Toshiba uses for their Lithium-titanate battery and is not notable for a page on its own. Also, the page SCIB is written in a form too close to WP:ADS. Thanks for your input. --Muhandes (talk) 11:56, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SCiB should just be deleted. Brand names are not appropriate in the article. There will be other brands of Lithium-titanate battery. No point having a section on one particular brand. It's just advertising for Toshiba. Delete it.--Lester 12:50, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just redirected the SCIB article to here, as it was blatant advertising. The previous version of the SCIB can still be viewed here. SCIB is just another brand of Lithium Titanate battery (reference). In fact, the term SCIB is actually a trademark owned by Toshiba.--Lester 20:42, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought we were having a discussion, but I guess you decided so there is no need for that. --Muhandes (talk) 05:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Lithium–titanate battery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mitsubishi i-MiEV battery cell info is incorrect.[edit]

In the USA and Europe, the miev does not use Lithium Titanate cells nor SCiB from Toshiba--it has a full pack at 360VDC and uses 88 cells made by Yuasa, the LEV50. The information in the blog by Stephen cited in the article as footnote #1 is not correct.

Here is info on the LEV50, http://lithiumenergy.jp/en/products/

a simple search also found reference to this cell being used: http://www.gsbattery.com/renewable-energy-electric-car

and info from Mitsubishi, http://www.mitsubishicars.com

Additional searching revealed that some Japanese-only versions of the car used a lower capacity battery pack made up of the LTO cells, http://pushevs.com/2016/05/09/toshiba-scib-introduces-a-new-23-ah-cell/ so i would like to see this noted in the article. kenny (173.25.249.251 (talk) 11:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

kenny (173.25.249.251 (talk) 02:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC))[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium–titanate battery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140525200937/http://www.tosa2013.com/en to http://www.tosa2013.com/en
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.schwinnelectricbikes.com/tailwind/electric_bike_technology.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Brands" (Advert tag)[edit]

Why the fuck is this in the article? Whatever the brand, the technology is identical. This is bullshit. 174.115.100.93 (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It should probably be removed, with relevant information moved elsewhere in the article. --Ita140188 (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name?[edit]

The article's name is "Lithium titanate", but in the introduction it refers to it as "Lithium titanate oxide", in any case, titanate already refers to an oxide, the two terms that might be interchangable should be Lithium Titanate and Lithium-titanium oxide, perhaps I am missing something? In any case, I would include both correct names in the intro. --Bsckr (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the CALENDAR life of LTO?[edit]

Sure, it lasts for many thousands of charge cycles, however, will it last simply ten years? 2600:6C51:423F:48C5:1120:2D0B:738E:4597 (talk) 00:41, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the info[edit]

What's the charge curves, like at what percent discharge is it when at 2v for example. 2600:6C51:423F:48C5:70EA:7044:6406:5B39 (talk) 02:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xj416 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Xj416 (talk) 18:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]