Talk:Keith Dudemeister

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Television

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles

The order of the info on this page is a bit weird. Also, none of the other character articles have quotes, so maybe those should be removed. EJB341 23:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hatred[edit]

One of the reasons J.D. starts hating Keith is that he fake-laughs at J.D.'s jokes. I'd quote the episode but I can't brain today, I have the dumb. Lots42 (talk) 00:52, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; used logic to find the info I wanted. Logic is fun! Lots42 (talk) 11:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings[edit]

Three warnings to say someone doesn't think the article is noteable. This is getting way beyond silly. Lots42 (talk) 14:25, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My intention wasn't to give a warning. My intention was to offer assistance in improving the article. I understand that it is frustrating when your work is tagged with a request for improvement - the best way to deal with it is to collaborate and make constructive edits to improve the article and then remove the tag.--Opark 77 (talk) 15:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]