Talk:Gonadarche

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Mid‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: Foundations II[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 June 2023 and 11 August 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sadoessa 08, JDavidUCSF, Marinagaducsf, Jdecano032 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Ainfante21 (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foundations II [First 1000 Days] Peer Review[edit]

Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

Previously, the article contained a definition and minor elaboration on the subject matter. The group has significantly improved this article in its depth of knowledge. The physiology section was a great introduction into the topic! I am a bit unclear on what the Prognosis section is referring to - is it the prognosis for the listed set of disorders? Kiana Hocutt (talk) 18:15, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been significantly improved - the topic is defined clearly and goes in depth by listing symptoms, comparison in sex, and different disorders associated with the topic. Sh.ucsf (talk) 18:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Significant improvement in both language and content of the article, including expansion on endocrinology and even added figures! The structure of the article flows well except for the final Prognosis section. It is unclear if prognosis refers to all or one of the conditions described above; may consider including as a sub-section of Diseases rather than its own section. May also consider added brief information re: diseases in lead paragraph. ElizabethHu3 (talk) 18:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes there has been a substantial improvement to the content, organization, formatting and overall quality of this article.

ChristianHailozian1 (talk) 20:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

The group has achieved their goals for improvement by completing all of their proposed edits and elaborating on each one of them. Sh.ucsf (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The group achieved all listed goals for improvement, and struck an appropriate balance of brevity while providing sufficient information.Kiana Hocutt (talk) 18:31, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The group has achieved their overall goals for improvement. ElizabethHu3 (talk) 18:43, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the group has achieved their overall goal for improvement.

ChristianHailozian1 (talk) 20:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? (explain)

The article was largely written in a neutral tone, with exception of the penultimate paragraph of the Central Precocious Puberty [CPP] / Progressive Precocious Gonadarche section. Stating an approach is flawed may not appear as neutral. It may be appropriate to reference the controversy of the height-outcomes approach, without passing specific judgement on its quality - assuming that there are conflicting study results. Kiana Hocutt (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available? (explain)

Some references are physical books and not accessible online; may have to change to online sources/e-book for it to be verifiable/freely available. Reference should be edited to only have the year - some of them have month and date. Sh.ucsf (talk) 18:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style? (explain)

For the most part the edits are consistent with Wikipedia's manual of style. There are some inconsistencies with punctuation, capitalization, and formatting that do not take away from the credibility content but are not fully in line with the listed guidelines. ChristianHailozian1 (talk) 19:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do the edits reflect language that supports diversity, equity, and inclusion? (explain)

Overall language is neutral and inclusive, and I do not see any inflammatory or potentially problematic language use. ElizabethHu3 (talk) 18:52, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kiana Hocutt (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Foundations II Group A [Gonadarche] proposed edits[edit]

-Briefly discuss physiology and specifically, describe the role of endocrine system in gonadarche.

-Describe specific endocrine/hormonal factors implicated with gonadal maturation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdecano032 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

-Diseases associated with gonadarche.

-Add citations. JDavidUCSF (talk) 23:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]