Talk:Fort Simpson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

==Fort Simpson (Pacific Coast) needed== No article yet, just serving notice that the HBC's Fort Simpson on what is now the BC Coast will have an article some day; not quite synonymous with Port Simpson, British Columbia; I used "Pacific Coast" on the redlink because Ft Simpson was in inincorporated territory, though dependent on New Caledonia (Canada) (also technically unincorporated at the time).Skookum1 (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Decided what to dab that as, it'll be Fort Simpson (Columbia Department) after the division of the HBC it was in; currently Port Simpson, British Columbia is a redirect to Lax Kw'alaams, British Columbia, which effectively is the same as if this article were titled by its Deh Cho name. The HBC fort needs its own article, though, ratehr than just a history section, and there may be grounds to split the indigenous village/clans there from the Port Simpson content; that may also be the case here, I don't know the NWT well enough to know....these notes are just a follow-up to my previous observation above; for anyone wishing to follow this please see Talk:Lax Kw'alaams, British Columbia, thanks for putting up with me.Skookum1 (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fort Good Hope, Northwest Territories which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 01:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved Peter Karlsen (talk) 23:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Fort Simpson, Northwest TerritoriesFort Simpson — Consider this a partial relisting of the discussion at Talk:Fort Good Hope#Requested move. Further comments would we welcome on whethere this article is the primary topic for Fort Simpson or whether that title should be a disambiguation page. Jafeluv (talk) 23:53, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - for the reasons I set out at the previous, above-noted discussion. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort Simpson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Fort Simpson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]