Talk:Emma Stone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleEmma Stone is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starEmma Stone is the main article in the Emma Stone series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 6, 2016.
Did You KnowOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 10, 2016Good article nomineeListed
April 23, 2016Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
April 27, 2016Peer reviewReviewed
June 5, 2016Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 26, 2016Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
August 26, 2016Featured article candidatePromoted
April 6, 2017Featured topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 22, 2016.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in order to move to Los Angeles to be an actress, Emma Stone prepared a PowerPoint presentation to convince her parents?
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 6, 2023.
Current status: Featured article

name[edit]

stone recently announced that she would prefer to go by her birth name Emily, rather than Emma. the Wikipedia page should change to reflect this. 81.107.189.48 (talk) 17:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, with Emma Stone redirecting to it. I came to this talk page specifically to see how Wikipedians would deal with this conundrum. Should an article about a notable person be of the same name they are most widely known by, or by the name they prefer?
It seems clear to me that in this case Emily's preferred name may win out simply because it is also their birth name. 82.7.129.10 (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. Article refers to her full name at start of the text so the title should be changed to reflect her wishes. 78.17.187.225 (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not opposed to the change, but we should maybe wait a little before changing her name in the article. It's not yet clear if people are going to call her Emily or stick with Emma. As per Wikipedia's guidelines, an article name may still refer to someone with their old name if people are more likely to associate them with that name (see Cat Stevens/Yusuf Islam's name). We should wait and see how the media and people call her in the next weeks and then decide to change the name or not. Saidjk (talk) 01:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Deadnaming hurts. Hektor (talk) 10:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with this also. We generally don't hesitate to change names as soon as people name a preference, and Emily is already her birth name so it's hardly a radical change. Owen (talk) 01:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, sort of is when Emma is still the WP:COMMONNAME and despite what she has stated she is still being regularly referred to as Emma Stone in the news and on promotional material for her upcoming films. Rusted AutoParts 16:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NAMECHANGES is the relevant policy, which instructs us to follow the reliable sources written after the announcement of the change. The current state is that WP:DEADNAME only applies to transgender and nonbinary people—or Cat Stevens and Kanye West would not be under those names. Nardog (talk) 21:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That policy is for subjects who undergo a name change, which does not apply here because "Emily Stone" is her legal AND preferred name. I agree that DEADNAME does not apply ("Emma Stone" is not a deadname), but I do think we should put strong weight on what an actor prefers to be referred to. By retaining Emma simply because it is dominant in media, Wikipedia contributes to the problem and makes any adjustment in representing her name that much more difficult. Note that recently a reporter DID refer her to Emily [1], and she thanked him for doing so, but he was immediately "corrected" and has even received backlash from people who didn't realize Emily was her preferred name. Owen (talk) 22:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It does apply if she changes her professional name, what she goes by. It did when Thandiwe Newton started going by her given name. If she changes what she goes by, the new name will show up in whatever press releases that mentions her and media will immediately comply. And even if they don't, it'll eventually show up in credits, but we don't seem to have sources confirming she is indeed changing what she goes by professionally, or what it will be. Nardog (talk) 01:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COMMONNAME still plays a role here. As established up above, despite the initial source and that interview, she’s still being mentioned in media as Emma Stone, still being represented in her films promotions as Emma Stone. She may prefer people interacting with her in public to call her Emily but unless going forward she is credited as Emily Stone in future films or promotion it would be incorrect to relocate the page. Rusted AutoParts 01:48, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]