Talk:NewtonScript

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

How is Apple's non-use of its own Dylan, in preference to licensing the externally developed NewtonScript, an example of "Not invented Here"? What that paragraph just missing the requisite number of wiki-buzzwords? Danieleran 03:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not invented within the Newton group. --Wkearney99 14:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My assessment[edit]

This seems to be a C class, low importance article according to the criteria outlined at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Computing/Assessmenty. I am new to Wikipedia in general, so please tell me if I have done anything wrong. -- Pyautogui (talk) 05:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]